Original text formerly posted in this site, in French : available at "ORIGINAL TEXT".
Kindly translated by Peter Fogg (Parramatta, Australia).
Questions by....
MQ : Michel Quesnel
Replies by....
PG : Philippe GAUTIER
To content | To menu | To search
Monday 2 July 2012
By Philippe GAUTIER on Monday 2 July 2012, 00:04 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
Original text formerly posted in this site, in French : available at "ORIGINAL TEXT".
Kindly translated by Peter Fogg (Parramatta, Australia).
Questions by....
MQ : Michel Quesnel
Replies by....
PG : Philippe GAUTIER
Monday 7 June 2010
By Philippe GAUTIER on Monday 7 June 2010, 15:18 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
What does Neutrality of the Net mean: in reference to what? How would one
measure it? Is it even feasible? Let us try to shed some light on the
subject.
Philippe GAUTIER,
originally released in French @ atelier.fr, translated from French by David KUNAU
Thursday 3 June 2010
By Philippe GAUTIER on Thursday 3 June 2010, 13:56 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
Que signifie véritablement cette expression, par rapport à quel concept parle-t-on de neutralité ? Comment la mesure-t-on? Mais surtout, est-elle possible ? Tentons d'y voir plus clair.
Wednesday 13 May 2009
By Philippe GAUTIER on Wednesday 13 May 2009, 18:13 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
EPCGlobal set of standards are one of the best available resources one can use to address traceability issues in closed or semi-open loops.
However, I consider the current EPCGlobal vision and concepts as somehow "limited" in its willingness and capacity to address every kind of actors in any situation (too much standardization, too many deterministic views, etc.).
This is why my company is using different approaches to enhance / leverage existing solutions (artificial intelligence, decisional analysis, etc.).
What has been done on DS (Discovery Services) so far (BRIDGE project, IETF, etc.) is, to my point of view, not always adapted to the market (real life) and I really wonder whether EPCGlobal will succeed or not with such an issue.
Actully deterministic and probabilistic approaches (some of the experimented ones) are not suited to treat complexity...
Philippe GAUTIER
Tuesday 7 October 2008
By Philippe GAUTIER on Tuesday 7 October 2008, 15:18 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
You can download the full presentation in PDF file (registered and
copyrighted !) : see below, at the end of the post.
Are the current approaches in Governance of the Internet still
relevant with the upcoming Internet of Things ?
Tuesday 8 July 2008
By Philippe GAUTIER on Tuesday 8 July 2008, 15:59 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
In a very interesting article from WIRED, Kevin Kelly explains how a "single worldwide computer" will raise
from technological evolution.
See : http://www.wired.com/special_multimedia/2008/st_infoporn_1607
I also posted a comment :
“One machine” (with a potential
finality) or “one system” (with no necessary one) ?
It will be, for sure, a "complex" and non deterministic system made of
billions of autonomous and self-decisioned actors (entities) with their own
independent finalities.
Referring to "complex systems
theories", the question is : "for which global ending ?” - chaotic evolution or targeted direction
?....
In the meanwhile complexity is increasing : it
is time to switch to full systemic
approaches in the design of our Information systems !
Philippe GAUTIER
Your comments would be higly appreciated !
Best regards,
Philippe
Monday 21 April 2008
By Philippe GAUTIER on Monday 21 April 2008, 11:12 - Web 3.0 / Internet of Things / Internet des Objets
Abstract :
''Recently, Vinton Cerf made an association between the raising concept of the
Internet of Things (“I-o-T” is an abstract gathering several others such as
“M2M”, “sensor, mesh, pervasive or ubiquitous networks”, “EPCGlobal standards”,
etc.) and the appellation “WEB 3.0” (seen in an article : www.lemonde.fr, 5th
april 2008). Instead of seeing it as a new IT marketing stuff, I’ve tried to
sort out what need there would be to use such a word, moreover considering that
most people still don’t know what Web 2.0 is…..''